Brumfield v. IBG LLC
This case concerns a patent dispute between Harris Brumfield, Trustee for Ascent Trust (Plaintiff-Appellant) and IBG LLC and Interactive Brokers LLC (Defendants-Appellees). The plaintiff alleged that...
View ArticleInline Plastics Corp. v. Lacerta Group, LLC
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard the appeal of Inline Plastics Corp. against Lacerta Group, LLC. Inline Plastics alleged that Lacerta infringed on several of its...
View ArticleAI Visualize, Inc. v. Nuance Communications, Inc.
AI Visualize, Inc. accused Nuance Communications, Inc. and Mach7 Technologies, Inc. of patent infringement in the District of Delaware. The patents in question concerned the visualization of medical...
View ArticleSalix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The case involves Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bausch Health Ireland Ltd., and Alfasigma S.P.A. (collectively, “Salix”) and Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Norwich”). Salix...
View ArticleLuv n’ Care, Ltd. v. Laurain
This case involves a dispute between two manufacturers of dining mats for toddlers, Luv n' Care, Ltd. and Nouri E. Hakim (collectively, “LNC”), and Lindsey Laurain and Eazy-PZ, LLC (collectively,...
View ArticleIntellectual Tech LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corp.
The case revolves around Intellectual Tech LLC (IT), a wholly owned subsidiary of OnAsset Intelligence, Inc. (OnAsset), and its patent dispute with Zebra Technologies Corporation (Zebra). In 2019, IT...
View ArticleSNAPRAYS v. LIGHTING DEFENSE GROUP
The case revolves around SnapRays, a Utah-based company that designs, markets, and sells electrical outlet covers with integrated guide lights, safety lights, motion sensor lights, and USB charging...
View ArticlePACKET INTELLIGENCE LLC v. NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.
This case involves Packet Intelligence LLC ("Packet") and NetScout Systems, Inc. and NetScout Systems Texas, LLC (collectively, "NetScout"). Packet had sued NetScout for patent infringement. The U.S....
View ArticleIOENGINE, LLC v. INGENICO INC.
The case involves IOENGINE, LLC (IOENGINE) appealing a series of Final Written Decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) that found certain...
View ArticleZIRCON CORP. v. ITC
In 2020, Zircon Corp. filed a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission alleging that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc. violated section 337 of...
View ArticleCOPAN ITALIA SPA v. PURITAN MEDICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC
The case involves a patent infringement dispute between Copan Italia S.p.A. and Copan Diagnostics Inc. (collectively, “Copan”) and Puritan Medical Products Company LLC and its affiliated companies...
View ArticleCORE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. NOKIA CORPORATION
Between November 2019 and August 2020, Core Optical Technologies, LLC filed complaints against three groups of defendants led by Nokia Corp., ADVA Optical Networking SE, and Cisco Systems, Inc. Core...
View ArticleSPECK v. BATES
The case revolves around a dispute between Ulrich Speck and Bruno Scheller (collectively, “Speck”) and Brian L. Bates, Anthony O. Ragheb, Joseph M. Stewart IV, William J. Bourdeau, Brian D. Choules,...
View ArticleECOFACTOR, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC
EcoFactor, Inc. sued Google LLC in the Western District of Texas, alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,327, which relates to the operation of smart thermostats in computer-networked...
View ArticleBETEIRO, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC.
The case involves Beteiro, LLC, which owns several patents related to facilitating gaming or gambling activities at a remote location. The patents disclose an invention that allows a user to...
View ArticleAMARIN PHARMA, INC. v. HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC.
The case involves Amarin Pharma, Inc., Amarin Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Amarin”) and Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and Hikma...
View ArticleZimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. v. Insall
Dr. John Insall, an orthopedic surgeon, developed and patented knee replacement devices, which he licensed to Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. In return, Zimmer agreed to pay royalties to Insall, and...
View ArticleNatera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Natera, Inc. and NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. are healthcare companies in the oncology testing industry. Natera owns two patents, U.S. Patent No. 11,519,035 and U.S. Patent No. 11,530,454, which...
View ArticleBACKERTOP LICENSING LLC v. CANARY CONNECT, INC.
Backertop Licensing LLC and Lori LaPray appealed the U.S. District Court of Delaware’s orders requiring LaPray to appear in-person for testimony regarding potential fraud and imposing monetary...
View ArticleMILLER MENDEL, INC. v. CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS
Miller Mendel, Inc. sued the City of Anna, Texas, alleging that the City’s use of the Guardian Alliance Technologies software platform infringed claims 1, 5, and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 10,043,188,...
View Article